Powered By Blogger

Monday, October 7, 2024

Do Siblings Have the Same DNA?

 Do Siblings Have the Same DNA? 
Mercedes Brons
The answer is no, siblings do not have identical DNA, even if they share both parents in common.  The only exception to this is in the case of identical siblings, since their DNA is exactly alike. Siblings share some DNA with each other, but at least half of their DNA will be different.  How can this be?
Siblings don’t have the same DNA, 
Siblings inherit different DNA from their parents.
If all of your siblings take a DNA test and upload their DNA data to Gedmatch, you can do really cool things like create a Lazarus kit, which is basically a recreation of your parents’ DNA using the DNA of you and your siblings. You and your siblings have collectively inherited a majority of your parents’ DNA, and the Lazarus kit splices the data together into a DNA kit for each of your parents.
Some people believe that if one of their siblings has done an Ancestry DNA test, there is nothing new to learn from other siblings doing the test, too. You’ll find out below why this isn’t true at all!In this post, you’ll learn:
Whether siblings have the same DNA
How much DNA full siblings and half-siblings share
What you can learn from having a sibling – or all of your siblings – do a DNA test, too
Let’s get started!
So, Do Siblings Have the Same DNA?
The answer is no, siblings do not have identical DNA, even if they share both parents in common.  The only exception to this is in the case of identical siblings, since their DNA is exactly alike. Siblings share some DNA with each other, but at least half of their DNA will be different.  How can this be? 
Why don’t full siblings have the same DNA?
You inherit 50% of your DNA from each parent, but that equals only half of each of your parent’s DNA. In other words, you got half of your mother’s DNA and half of your father’s.
This means that there was 50% of each parent’s DNA that you didn’t inherit.  The portion of DNA that you did and didn’t inherit was selected in an entirely random way.
Your sibling inherited DNA in a similar way, meaning that they also got a random 50% selection of your mom and dad’s DNA. 
Since the process is random, at least as far as scientists can tell. What we know about random selection and statistics leads us to the fact that there is no way that each of you randomly inherited the exact same 50% of each parent’s DNA.
Some will be the same, while other portions of the DNA that you both got from your shared parents will be different.
The process of DNA inheritance is complicated, and many people are really overwhelmed when they realize how much they will have to learn about it in order to really make sense of their DNA results. 
The jellybean example
While I am over-the-moon in love with DNA testing, there is some pretty crazy science involved behind the scenes. That’s why I love the jellybean analogy.
Imagine that you are sitting in front of two giant jugs of jellybeans.  Each jug has 7,000 jellybeans, and each jug represents DNA from each of your parents.  You are instructed to pour half of each container into a new jug, which represents your own DNA.
You then put them back.
Your sister or brother comes along, and is instructed to do the same thing (let’s pretend, in our story, that the jellybeans magically were poured back into the right jug for mom or dad).  Your sibling pours jellybeans from each container into their own jug.
How many matching jellybeans do you think you each got? Chances are that about 50% of your jellybeans were the same, and about 50% of them were different.  This is a very simplified example of the way that DNA inheritance works. 
When your parents conceived you, the DNA that you randomly inherited from each parent was already programmed into the sperm and the egg.  A statistician could probably give us the exact odds, but all we really need to know is that probability favors about half of your randomly chosen jellybeans matching the ones that your sibling selected.
(There is a more detailed explanation below for those who want to learn even more about this)
In this image below, I illustrate overlapping shared DNA between siblings, and what is not shared:
Do Siblings Have the Same DNA


How much DNA do siblings share with each other?
As you see from the above graphic, full siblings should share about 50% of their DNA with each other.  This amount varies naturally, however, from about 32-54%.
The numbers for half-siblings varies, too.  Half-siblings share between 18-32% of their DNA.
Measured in centimorgans, which is the typical unit of measurement that is used to describe the length of DNA segments shared between relatives:
Full siblings: 2300-3900 centimorgans
Half-siblings: 1300-2300 centimorgans
Siblings share lots of DNA segments
I have a confession.   There is a pretty big flaw in my jelly bean example. 
Do you remember about centimorgans being the unit of measurement for shared DNA?  The jellybean example can give the impression that each centimorgan is inherited separately, like in an individual piece. 
In reality, this is not how it works at all.  Yes, you do inherit many centimorgans, but most of them are actually “stuck together” in what are called “DNA segments”. 
The centimorgans are not thrown into a big jug and mixed up, like my example could lead you to believe.
Siblings will share DNA segments on each chromosome
You have 22 numbered chromosomes that are relevant to our discussion here.  If you remember from school that you actually have 23 chromosomes, you are right – the 23rd one is a chromosome that determines whether you are biologically male or female. 
The inheritance patterns for the 23rd chromosome is very different than it is for the autosomal DNA, which is found in the 22 numbered chromosomes.
On each numbered chromosome, you will inherit some DNA from each parent.  The genetic material will be passed down in long segments that will vary in length.
These segments are made up of our individual jellybeans, if you will. 
If we imagine that your mother has a red, purple, blue, black, and white jellybean on her 2nd chromosome, you might have inherited the red, black, and white one, and it’s possible that they all show up right there in a row on your 2nd chromosome.
Your sibling will have received DNA in long segments, too.  If you have a sister, she might have inherited the red, purple, and black jellybeans. 
It’s possible that the red and purple ones are in one segment on the 2nd chromosome, and the black one is a segment by itself on the same chromosome. 
If this were the case, you would have two identical DNA segments on that chromosome.
Siblings share segments on each chromosome
On each chromosome, you will have DNA segments that you share with your sibling.  If your sibling is a full sibling, you should share lots of very long segments, and the total of those segments should add up to a number that falls within the range mentioned here in this article. 
Half-siblings will share lots of segments, too, but they will be shorter and the total number will probably (but not definitely) add up to a number higher than those shared between siblings.
The result of all of this is that while some of your DNA is identical to that of your sibling, there is much that won’t match.  Additionally, if you have lots of siblings, you can even share more or less DNA with them than your other siblings do.
Note:  Remember the red, purple, blue, black, and white jellybeans from chromosome 2?  Did you notice that neither sibling inherited the red one?  This is important to note for the next section.
What you can learn from having a sibling do a DNA test
So let’s talk about that red jellybean.  You didn’t inherit it, and if your sister didn’t do a DNA test, you don’t even know about it.  That red jellybean might contain a trace ethnicity that didn’t show up on your report, or it might match a third cousin that doesn’t match you – since 10% of our third cousins don’t share DNA with us. 
And that third cousin might have the key to breaking down the brick wall in your family tree.
If your mother did a DNA test, then you don’t have to worry.  The red jellybean was tested and the information contained within it will show up on her test results.  However, sometimes our parents can’t test, won’t test, or are no longer with us. 

This is why it’s good to have as many siblings test as possible, when the parents are not available for whatever reason.
If both parents have tested, there is no additional information that can be learned about family history, since all of the DNA inherited by the siblings started out as DNA from the parents. 
The only reason to test siblings if parents have already tested is if the siblings are curious to see what they inherited, or if they would just like to verify their relationships as full siblings.
If all of your siblings take a DNA test and upload their DNA data to Gedmatch, you can do really cool things like create a Lazarus kit, which is basically a recreation of your parents’ DNA using the DNA of you and your siblings. You and your siblings have collectively inherited a majority of your parents’ DNA, and the Lazarus kit splices the data together into a DNA kit for each of your parents.
Conclusion
I hope that you learned a little about how and why our DNA is not identical to that of our siblings.  I am looking forward to hearing from you in the comments.
Thanks for stopping by!

Share the knowledge!

Wednesday, September 18, 2024

Haiti - the first black Republic


The reason why the US the French. The British., the Spanish.. and the Europeans despise the first black Republic. Haiti. they never forgive  - Don Salmon 

Tuesday, September 3, 2024

Most family feuds are respecting property

  Bless up   
The accounts as I understand them are based on inheritance denied Rachael (Campbell) Sancho and Charles Campbell by their brother Donald Friday Campbell.
Most family feuds are respecting property - inheritance disallowed - fake wills.  There are too numerous accounts in Sancho heritage and other folks in my adopted ancestral homelands not to be accurate. 
I am not sure whether James Campbell disinherited his big daughter. I am aware he was not pleased with her impending marriage to Allick Sancho. I recalled being told James Campbell hurried himself by his horse and carriage to the church in Victoria to stop the wedding. Most narrators claim James Campbell discontinued his donations to the church.  Are you aware of James Campbell repairing St. Mary's Scots Church at Jonestown, Mahaica? I am told my ancestor Walter Young built the church. Also James Campbell may have built a church at Victoria. I suppose the one where my grandparents were married. I understand only the bell was a reminder by the mid-1950s.
Also it was said James Campbell donated the land upon which the leprosy Hospital was constructed. However, I have not managed to access any information on the ownership of Lancaster in the print media of the colonial authorities. 
Allick Sancho did not measure up to his expectations as a son-in-law.  I never heard of James Campbell visiting his daughter's residence at Sandy Street in Golden Grove and/or his son Charles at Nabaclis. Yet it appears James Campbell was extremely close to his grandchildren. My mother, Muriel Sancho was absolutely fond of her grandfather, James Campbell. Also my aunts gushed about their grandfather. Perhaps they visited with him at Mahaica. Yet, they were fond of Donald Friday Campbell. It appears whenever Muriel Sancho visited her Uncle; it was an emergency and/or to bond with Mama Deli Campbell.  They all loved Deli (Elias) Campbell.
My feeling is the feuding is no more. All the respective parties have departed. The ill-feelings are long gone with them. The land is now possessions of East Indians. I won't be for rehashing accounts that cannot be proven.  I am concerned and committed to acquiring knowledge of the genealogy of Campbell/Solomon/Friday/Kissoon and be them Ramotar and/or Mootoo and whoever else are our relatives.
I know the 1942 Daily Chronicle has accounts of the transitions of three Campbell people who are likely of interest to my Campbell heritage. I would to access same soonest. Copies of the papers are not readily available at the NYPL 
I believe let the feuding remain with who came and left before us. I have move on from that climate, a long time ago. I don't think any of my first cousins are into that past relationships. Perhaps Dr. James Campbell is a bit resentful. I detected he was not too enthusiastic talking about Donald Friday Campbell.  As per myself I regret not visiting Donald and Deli Campbell when I was into my twenties. I thought they passed on. I was surprised when I was enlightened Deli and Donald transitioned in November 1977 and April 1981, respectively. While I was in the GDF 1974-1977, I used to regularly run from Nabaclis to Mahaica Bridge and back. Had I known I would have visited my grand Uncle and Aunt? Why not?
Again bless up let's continue the communications. Shall we?

Sunday, September 1, 2024

Norman Eustace Cameron writing about Thomas R. F. Elliott.

 EMANCIPATION CHORUS.
By T. R. F. Elliott.
 Forward! Sons of Africa;
March in Progress’ Train!
Now in far America
Yoked no more in chain.
“Forward!” let your watchword be,
Forward, Brethren! You are free;
Forward! ’Tis your jubilee;
Rise and wisdom gain!
Chorus.
Forward! Sons of Africa;
Though far o’er the sea;
Yet in far America
Chant your jubilee.
 Forward! Freedom, onward move!
Brethren of mankind!
Forward! Onward, strive to improve!
Elevate your mind.
Be not deaf to Progress’ call;
Forward, Brethren! March on, all!
You can rise, both great and small.
None should flag behind.
 Forward! Onward, upward rise!
Grasp a nobler fate;
Cultivate the gift that lies
Dormant and innate!
You no more in serfdom kept;
Fifty summers have not slept,
Have not mourned and have not wept
’Neath the tyrants’ weight.
 Forward! Try to imitate
Other who have striven
Hard to gain a nobler state,
Which at last is given,
Join the Ethiopic hand
In one vast, colossal band –
In one unity, so grand,
As that in heaven.
 
 
 
THANKSGIVING
 by T. R.  F. Elliott.
 God, Creator, Father dear!
Bend us low Thy gracious ear;
From Thy heav’nly home above,
List in mercy and in love
To this feeble psalm of praise
We, now freeborn, meekly raise
Joyfully, dear God, to Thee
In this year of Jubilee!
 God, Redeemer, Brother kind,
Holy, lowly, meek in mind;
Who on Calvary suffered death,
So to gain us ceaseless breath,
Hear from heav’n, Thy high abode,
This thanksgiving prayer and ode
Which we freeborn chant to Thee
In this year of Jubilee!
 God, our Comforter and Friend,
Be with us till time shall end;
Grant us grace, and strong faith give,
So that here on earth we live,
Perfect, upright, good and true,
While our heav’nly course pursue;
Hear our prayer we pour to Thee
In this year of Jubilee!
 Now, upraise your voices all!
On your knees each freeborn fall,
Praise Jehovah, King and God,
Bow submissive to His rod,
And His great bless’d name adore
Henceforth and for evermore!
Praise Him, O ye people free,
On this Freedom’s Jubilee!
 
REJOICE! ’TIS FREEDOM’S JUBILEE.
 Rejoice! rejoice! rejoice!
All hearts of true-born free!
Shout forth in grateful melody –
“Rejoice! rejoice! rejoice!
’Tis Freedom’s Jubilee!”
No more the tyrant’s yoke to bear,
No more his cruel anger fear,
No more this flesh with lashes tear,
No more the mark of woe we wear;
But free are we to-day,
Hence all should chant this lay,
In strains of sweetest harmony –
“Rejoice! rejoice! rejoice!
’Tis Freedom’s Jubilee!”
 “Rejoice! rejoice! rejoice!
All hearts of true-born free!
In tuneful voices join this glee –
“Rejoice! rejoice! rejoice!
’Tis Freedom’s Jubilee!”
Bless God that we have not been born
Poor wretched slaves, in bond forlorn ;
Our souls with ignorance adorn,
By toil and pain and grief out worn ;
No, free are we to-day,
Hence all should chant this lay,
In strains of sweetest harmony –
“Rejoice! rejoice! rejoice!
’Tis Freedom’s Jubilee!”
 “Rejoice! rejoice! rejoice!
All hearts of true-born free!
Sing forth this theme quite merrily –
“Rejoice! rejoice! rejoice!
’Tis Freedom’s Jubilee!”
Full fifty years have passed away
Since Slavery lost its ruling away,
And we, this first of August day,
Our psalm of thanks to God do pray ;
For free  we are to-day,
Hence all should chant this lay,
In strains of sweetest harmony –
“Rejoice! rejoice! rejoice!
’Tis Freedom’s Jubilee!”
 
JUBILEE CAROL
A merry Jubilee to all,
May choicest blessings on you fall
From those storehouses up above,
Teeming with peace, and joy and love,
May every heart be light and gay ;
In joy this day be passed away ;
May every voice in rapture call,
“A merry, merry, Jubilee to all!”
Chorus.
Merrily let us pass away,
 This happy merry Freedom Day;
This day the source of Freedom’s joyful birth,
Then all with eager hearts combine
To hail the Lord of Lords Divine
Oh, make ye no delay,
Come hail the Lord of Lords Divine
This merry, merry, Freedom Day.
 
The Earth within her circling bound,
Unchecked, hath fifty times gone round
Since freedom was restored to those
Who erewhile suffered bitter woes ;
Their hearts made glad, their faces bright
Their souls unshroud to wisdom’s light?
This day to celebrate we meet
And “Merry Jubilee to all” we greet.
 
Chorus: Merrily let us pass away, etc.
 
A happy freedom to old age!
May youth enjoy long life and sage!
A happy freedom to the sad!
Oh, may their hearts again be  glad;
A merry freedom to the poor –
May God replenish their spent store!
To weak and strong, to great and small,
A merry, merry freedom to all!
 

Chorus: Merrily let us pass away, etc.

 

T. R. F. Elliott., 1888

It is very easy to understand how religion and emancipation had such a prominent place in the poetical writings of the earlier negroes. They naturally saw emancipation as the greatest event in their history and felt its inspiring influence, hence much of their poetry centered in this theme.

There is yet another feature, namely, that in the earliest productions, the thanks for emancipation are distributed between God, Queen Victoria, and the politicians. In later productions the poet gave his thanks to God principally, while in years to come the value of the right hand of the slaves in battle in hastening emancipation will be recognized by our poets. We may compare Oliver’s poem “oh! Ye first of August” with the following anonymous song, written in a more martial and rugged spirit:-

“ Liberty, boys forever, boys hurrah

Oh, liberty, boys forever, boys hurrah, boys hurrah

Oh, we rally round the bounty blue flag

We rally once again

Shouting in the battle cry Freedom.

 “ Victoria gave us freedom, boys hurrah,

Oh, Victoria gave us freedom, boys hurrah, boys hurrah

Oh, we rally round the bounty blue flag

We rally once again

Shouting in the battle cry Freedom.”

 

The “rally round the bounty blue flag” becomes clear when one bears in mind that the mediaeval Africans were accustomed to fight with flags and standards, and that the slaves would sometimes hoist a flag in their rebellions.

Fifty years later Thomas Elliott conceived the idea of celebrating the Jubilee of emancipation in fine style. He spared no pains to make it a success, and so filled was he with enthusiasm over the event that it is not surprising that his own  songs best reflected the spirit of the occasion. All the songs and hymns song were of local creation, and so was the music, the choir  of 150 voices being under Sandiford Blades, one of the outstanding musicians and composers of the time. All the contributors, Elliott, Blades, Leo, G. W. Rockcliffe, S. E. Wills seemed to recognize that God himself was behind the great emancipation. Elliott was also a prose writer. He actually wrote some account of the history of the Negroes from1838 to 1888, but I do not know what became of it.

 

Source:

Cameron, Norman Eustace (1931) Guianese poetry, covering the hundred years' period, 1831-1931. Selected and edited by Norman Eustace Cameron, Georgetown , British Guiana , Printed by "The Argosy" Company, Limited, 1931.

Saturday, August 31, 2024

World War One and World War Two soldiers from British Guiana

Please point M'Lilwana Osanku to where he may be able to locate a listing of the soldiers from British Guiana , members of “The British West Indian Regiment”, and “South Caribbean Force” who participated in World War One and World War Two?

M'Lilwana Osanku is particularly interested in sources of materials. Osanku  needs the dates soldiers were enlisted, transported out of the colony and the dates they returned. 

How about reports concerning soldiers published in the Daily Argosy (British Guiana), and  Daily Chronicle (British Guiana) and other such newspapers?

Such data will be fine with Osanku. The information  would likely identify folks now unknown.

M'Lilwana Osanku is aware The Most Honorable Leopold Duncan Sarrabo (1864-1961), tells us, in his Historical Review of Golden Grove Village: Events, Improvements and Achievements, 1848 -1948, twenty five men from Golden Grove served in Egypt , France and Belgium in World War 1 of 1914-18. Mr. Sarrabo listed twenty-one of twenty-five soldiers from Golden Grove.  Their names are Matthias Harding; Arthur Pompey who rose to be Corporal; Arthur Rodney; John De Souza; Arnold Thomas; John Graham; Jimmy Hercules; Lionel Waterman; Tommy Kendall; Samuel Charles; Augustus Toney; Iris Lopes; Joseph Lopes; George Wilson; Thomas Lewis; Sway Sydney; B. Sydney; Willie Franklin; Reggie Rodney; Jephtah Glasgow; and Thomas Eversley. Mr. Sarrabo there is four others whose names he could not now recall.

 M'Lilwana Osanku is interested at this moment in the heritage of Willie Franklin; Jephtah Glasgow; Jimmy Hercules, Thomas Lewis, Arnold Thomas, George Wilson and Thomas Eversley. Please facilitate soonest.  Who are the folks M'Lilwana Osanku need to consult who ought to be able to advice him on the methods and/or approaches necessary to accomplish the goal? 

M'Lilwana Osanku  would love to be made aware of the names of the four others and those from the villages of the East Coast of Demerara. They are more than likely to be relatives of Campbell , Sancho and Young/e.

Thanks a million.

Are you aware of the following publications?

  1. Race, War and Nationalism: a social history of West Indians in the First World War  (Glenford Deroy Howe)
  2. ·The British West Indian Regiment, 1914-1918, Journal of Caribbean History, Volume 7 November 1973.  (C. L. Joseph)
  3. ·The British Caribbean who, what, why (Lloyd Sydney Smith) 1st- ed.; 1955/56 and 1965.   [It is likely several editions have survived]

 Newspaper Articles

  1. ·        ‘Rogue or Recruit? The British Guiana Daily Argosy (27 January 1916), p. 4.  
  2. ·        ‘Decamps after promising to enlist', The British Guiana Daily Argosy (6 May 1916), p. 4.  
  3. ·        “Bobo” Reece recalled', The Barbados Globe (31 May 1916), p. 3. ...
  4. ·        ‘Teasing BG recruits', The British Guiana Daily Argosy (4 May 1916), p. 4.

Saturday, August 24, 2024

Guyana cricket is smiling and suffering


 This then young Mande in British Guiana was disappointed when he was  made Guyana cricket will  not be made independent of West Indies cricket, in 1966.  

Is it possible Guyana cricket will become a major industry? When will Guyana cricket become a high earning foreign currency enterprise - for Guyanese?  Guyana cricket a dream defrauded. Why is Guyana cricket still in denial? Guyana cricket is smiling and suffering – the classic syndrome of illusion of inclusion - in West Indies cricket. It is past due for Guyana cricket to be proactive  in terms of the global market. It is obvious  to Guyanese and Guyana cricket

West Indies offer little or no opportunities to Indians, spinners, Guyana cricketers. How many more Guyanese must suffer the same and/or similar experiences as Chatterpaul Persaud, Randolph Ramnarace, Veerasammy Permaul, Chandrapaul Hemraj, Gudakesh Motie, Shimron Hetmyer, Anthony Bramble and Leon Johnson? How many more generations? 

Government need to get involved. Guyana cricket must start doing business with Indian nations’ teams. Berbice does not need West Indies cricket. Guyana does not need West Indies cricket. Berbice, Demerara and Essequebo must also be playing  regularly, against teams other than themselves. Berbice, Demerara and Essequebo ought to be regularly matched in three games series in the genres  against Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka  touring Guyana. And not only that Guyana should be touring those countries every two years.   Guyanese must stop participating in nonsense called West Indies cricket. Let Cricket West Indies die quickly. This POW can not wait to read the eulogies and obituaries of Cricket West Indies.

Monday, August 12, 2024

Pragmatic Historian, Researcher and Critical Thinker

 This Mande arrived in the physical realm armed with a pineal gland. During this incarnation, he has employed his third eye - his all-seeing eye - to gleam   historical truths and realities respecting life from the beginnings of the human experience to current times. He considers himself a pragmatic historian, researcher and critical thinker. He utilizes his natural spectacles through the lens of his understanding of "African" consciousness. On Friday, October 2, 2020, he tried explaining his views: the natural order of life is feminine;  nothing is  holy respecting the contents of the  so-called holy books; prenatal and immediate post natal period of humans offer glimpses of the evolution of human beings; non- DNA individuals are often found within nuclear families and kinship; Imhotep never referred to himself as an African; none of the indigenous Pharaohs referred to themselves as Egyptian, Nubian and African; there was not a single African before the Romans defeated Hannibal; therefore, Africa is not the name of the landmass and certainly, African is a misnomer assigned to our people. It is said The ancients referred to the area in which they swelled as the land of ancestors. Their ancestors came from the south, east of the River Nile. This Mande takes offense whenever he realize humans are perturbed at truthful revelations that has not been maliciously accessed. He was disappointed with his relatives of his  paternal grandmother for distancing themselves from the reality. She had numerous liaisons which produced children. Hence, this Mande is absolutely uncomfortable with their accounting of the descendants of his grandmother. How could they not be interested in the name and vital statistics of his mother and the other mothers of his father's children? On the other hand, a number of His maternal relatives, are not interested in either family history or gatherings of the people. A number are reluctant to express 

quite comfortable with gossiping, heresy and outrageous lies. The statement, "John Sancho was a sweet boy" is rubbish. Also, Bentick Sancho, John Sancho and Tuckness Sancho are siblings  is not documented. Therefore, is unfounded and unlikely to be  historical truth. Three Sancho brothers arrived in Demerara to purchase real estate is hogwash and utter foolishness. The Intelligent Sancho would utilize entries found in historical records for documentation of family history. The slave registers contradict the nonsense spewed by several Sancho people. The narrative must be change to reflect truth and reality as found in print media. It's that plain. It's that simple. This Mande is not interested in being popular among any group. He aspire to be historically accurate as humanly possible. He hates those who peddle misinformation. He hates lies, especially outrageous lies respecting his ancestors and other loved ones. Of course, he is finds the female falsely claiming the photograph of the  McDonald mother and son to be the images of his maternal grandparents, Alexander and Rachael, absolutely malicious and most disgusting. He is aware she made a  most putrid comment respecting the transition of his most beloved aunt in April 1966. Thus, he was not surprised at her shenanigans and stinking thinking in April 2029. Thus.  he questioned both her mindset and her DNA as per Sancho. There was a period he considered everyone with the surname his DNA relative. Those days are over. Those days are long gone. He is aware of several individuals who were adopted. A number of the children of adopted Sancho use the surname. Then, of course, Sancho males also received gifts,  from their spouses and other relationships. Forget the narratives of the two Sancho folk songs. Life experiences aren't one way streets.  It's likely this Mande stands alone. So what? - Muriel gone home, Oswald gone home, Baiya gone home, Colin gone home, Matthews gone home, East-to-West gone home, Bigman gone home, Tunka gone home, Burchell gone home, and one day, in the not too distant future, he will fly away home. If he stands alone - so be it . He is confident. The  future generations will appreciate his efforts, energy, frequencies and vibrations. He will be vindicated